John Ravilious
FREE ENERGY & LOUDSPEAKERS
John Ravilious
It is generally believed that the reality in which we live, is part AC and part DC, with effects like motion and time being DC effects. So if I throw a ball, then this ball is supposed to move uniformly forwards through the air.
And now I want to make a perhaps rather unlikely statement and say that all actions in our reality, are in fact AC processes. So if I throw a ball, then I see the motion of this ball as AC, and the time effect that permitted this motion, as also AC, and like AC electricity.
And now the subject I want to write about is how to form free energy. And of course this is quite impossible, as all the energy in the universe was formed at an earlier stage in the evolution of our reality, and one can no longer make energy. But hang on a moment, if we have got this wrong, and our reality really is an AC system and not DC, then does this change the picture? Maybe it is possible to have an AC reality where energy can freely form.
So now I hope to show how just such an energy generation mechanism operates. What I want to start off by doing is looking at the motion of a wave. And here we see a complex AC system, like the AC electricity supply that lights up the bathroom light bulb.
So now I want to attempt to show what AC action occurs when a wave moves. And I am afraid that this is not in any text book, so I had better state that this is what I personally think happens here. So unless one happens to be dealing with a standing wave, then a wave will move forwards, and move at just one speed, so all waves have a forwards wave speed, and this speed is special.
And now I intend to make an outrageous statement, and say that a wave chooses a forwards speed, that gives it a complex time effect, that permits its motion to have an equal time forwards, to time backwards action, or rate. And now I want to suggest that this wave AC time action is the secret of energy creation.
So here I see this wave motion effect as like an equalising action, that balances out time forwards against time backwards. And as I say this is not in any text book. So in fact I suppose this has to be wrong.
What I want you to do now is imagine that you have switched on an electric torch. And here I want to be a bit fanciful and say that as this beam of light that this torch produces, is as I have explained, time balanced. So that as much energy as the beam needs to form light waves, will go both ways. So in fact electrical energy will be taken from the battery to form light, but also returned to the battery to cancel the current needed to form this light.
So to describe the action here in more detail. You switch on a torch, and a pulse of light leaves the torch bulb and travels away from the glass bulb, travelling forwards in forwards time. But now this is followed by an equal pulse of light, that travels backwards towards the glass bulb and the bulb filament.
But it so happens, that as this occurs, time starts to go backwards, which then means that this second pulse of light, in fact goes forwards, and so it links up with the other pulse of light which heads forwards in time, which then produces a beam of light.
But now, as this second pulse happens to be time reversed, it also manages to send electrical energy backwards towards the battery. And this then cancels out the current that was used to produce the original time forwards pulse.
So I want to claim that no work at all is needed to produce light or any other wave. And I suppose this is about the most stupid statement one could possibly make, and is quite simply not the case.
Anyway what I have been doing is employing loudspeakers to form sound waves. And of course I want to claim that the sound waves generated by a loudspeaker, are these time symmetrical, or time balanced sound waves, that should in theory, need virtually no electrical energy to generate.
So this has been my project, to work out a loudspeaker design, that uses far less electrical energy to form sound.
And now I have got a lot of explaining to do. And I want to start off by clarifying my model of motion with time. And here I see all motion as this back and forth time effect, that then produces this one way action, that I talked about with the torch bulb and battery.
So what I am saying is that all uniform motion is in fact this trick forwards motion, that is produced when some work or energy moves forwards.
Okay. And so to recap, we have objects or waves moving forwards, which results in this time back and forth feature, that then produces this very odd sort of false motion forwards. And as a note, we humans then come along and say that they can see that waves and objects can move forwards, and that therefore there must be a time effect that also goes forwards.
Alright. And now to spell this out. There is no forwards time effect at all. But this time effect, as I have already stated, is AC, and goes backwards and forwards on the spot.
And now I don’t know if I am making this clear to you, or just confusing you. Anyway I am going to carry on with this theory now. What I want to talk about is the curious effect where the direction of time is tied into motion. So that if I accelerate say north, then time will take a step forwards. And where I accelerate south, then time will take a step backwards. And obviously where I decelerate, then these two time directions will swap places.
And now I hope what I am about to say is not too big a jump back to the torch bulb and battery. And I must warn you that this is a bit tricky to understand. Now if you remember, I said that we had a bulb which was producing time balanced, or time symmetrical light waves, where a unit of electrical energy, was lighting up a bulb. But there was also an identical unit of electrical energy, that was heading backwards towards the battery, and cancelling out the power, that just a moment ago lit up this bulb.
Okay. And now it turns out that it is impossible to make light, or any type of wave, go in just one direction. So Sir Isaac Newton’s law applies here, where he says that to every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction. And with a wave producing device, then one is effectively forced to make two opposite waves, that head in two opposite directions.
So now I need you to picture a time forwards and time backwards wave pulse, that allows a wave to move forwards. But now I hope that you will see that this north/south direction effect will result in the creation of an opposite north/south pulse, that is the other way up in time.
And so now the power supply that is receiving these cancelled pulses of electrical energy, will in fact get two sets of pulses, that will cancel out each other. So now the work cancel effect that should mean that the bulb lights up for free, is prevented from operating.
And now are you any the wiser? What this means is that although there is this work cancel effect, that should mean that a torch bulb lights up for free, this action is in fact rendered inoperative, so that now the battery is forced to provide current to power the bulb. So that it works out that for all actions that are driven by work, then energy will be conserved.
And now to return to my ultra-efficient loudspeaker design. Well it looks as though it is going to be quite impossible to make this more than 100% efficient. Although we should in theory, be able to make this energy free. However the north/south cancel effect will always spoil the action.
So what can we do? And the answer is that if we absorb the soundwaves, that leave the back of the speaker cone, then the north/south cancel action will simply not occur. And now believe it or not, it is as simple as that. I have been placing an absorbent material behind my speaker cone. (See photograph). And the effect this has on speaker efficiency is remarkable.
And now what I have done here is very tightly packed the space behind my speaker with horsehair. And then estimated the sound level, so as to approximately equal a normal speaker, being driven with five watts. And I then measured the AC voltage across my horsehair packed speaker voice coil, and to my amazement, it worked out that where the voice coil had a resistance of 8 ohms, then the incoming power that was driving the speaker and making the sound, was 0.1 watts.
Alright, so it now looked as though my sound dampened speaker could be fifty times more efficient than a normal speaker. And now I had the job of proving that this super efficiency was in fact real, and that my speaker really was almost fully loaded by 0.1 watts of power.
Sorry, and here I am going to have to be a bit technical so to prove that this speaker really was as it seemed and very efficient. I wired a small 8 ohm resistor in series with the speaker voice coil. And here I found that the voltage across this resistor, was the same as the voltage across the speaker terminals.
So now I needed to know how much heat this small series resistor produced when the speaker was in use, and so I glued the small resistor to the bulb of a thermometer. And here, with the speaker producing loud sound, the temperature rise in the resistor was so small that I could not measure it at all. So it now looked as though the power being used by the speaker, was extremely small, and was indeed 0.1 watts.
And now there was one other effect that suggested that very little power was involved here. And this was that the cone of the speaker stopped all movement, even though this same cone was producing very loud sounds.
So this is my speaker design, and I think that it proves my theory, that waves move in a work, or energy free manner. And the speaker itself, well it produces a wonderful clear sound, that I think could have many applications. I think it might possibly be employed to relax people who are clinically stressed.
And the principle of free wave power, well who knows where this could one day lead.
John Ravilious
It is generally believed that the reality in which we live, is part AC and part DC, with effects like motion and time being DC effects. So if I throw a ball, then this ball is supposed to move uniformly forwards through the air.
And now I want to make a perhaps rather unlikely statement and say that all actions in our reality, are in fact AC processes. So if I throw a ball, then I see the motion of this ball as AC, and the time effect that permitted this motion, as also AC, and like AC electricity.
And now the subject I want to write about is how to form free energy. And of course this is quite impossible, as all the energy in the universe was formed at an earlier stage in the evolution of our reality, and one can no longer make energy. But hang on a moment, if we have got this wrong, and our reality really is an AC system and not DC, then does this change the picture? Maybe it is possible to have an AC reality where energy can freely form.
So now I hope to show how just such an energy generation mechanism operates. What I want to start off by doing is looking at the motion of a wave. And here we see a complex AC system, like the AC electricity supply that lights up the bathroom light bulb.
So now I want to attempt to show what AC action occurs when a wave moves. And I am afraid that this is not in any text book, so I had better state that this is what I personally think happens here. So unless one happens to be dealing with a standing wave, then a wave will move forwards, and move at just one speed, so all waves have a forwards wave speed, and this speed is special.
And now I intend to make an outrageous statement, and say that a wave chooses a forwards speed, that gives it a complex time effect, that permits its motion to have an equal time forwards, to time backwards action, or rate. And now I want to suggest that this wave AC time action is the secret of energy creation.
So here I see this wave motion effect as like an equalising action, that balances out time forwards against time backwards. And as I say this is not in any text book. So in fact I suppose this has to be wrong.
What I want you to do now is imagine that you have switched on an electric torch. And here I want to be a bit fanciful and say that as this beam of light that this torch produces, is as I have explained, time balanced. So that as much energy as the beam needs to form light waves, will go both ways. So in fact electrical energy will be taken from the battery to form light, but also returned to the battery to cancel the current needed to form this light.
So to describe the action here in more detail. You switch on a torch, and a pulse of light leaves the torch bulb and travels away from the glass bulb, travelling forwards in forwards time. But now this is followed by an equal pulse of light, that travels backwards towards the glass bulb and the bulb filament.
But it so happens, that as this occurs, time starts to go backwards, which then means that this second pulse of light, in fact goes forwards, and so it links up with the other pulse of light which heads forwards in time, which then produces a beam of light.
But now, as this second pulse happens to be time reversed, it also manages to send electrical energy backwards towards the battery. And this then cancels out the current that was used to produce the original time forwards pulse.
So I want to claim that no work at all is needed to produce light or any other wave. And I suppose this is about the most stupid statement one could possibly make, and is quite simply not the case.
Anyway what I have been doing is employing loudspeakers to form sound waves. And of course I want to claim that the sound waves generated by a loudspeaker, are these time symmetrical, or time balanced sound waves, that should in theory, need virtually no electrical energy to generate.
So this has been my project, to work out a loudspeaker design, that uses far less electrical energy to form sound.
And now I have got a lot of explaining to do. And I want to start off by clarifying my model of motion with time. And here I see all motion as this back and forth time effect, that then produces this one way action, that I talked about with the torch bulb and battery.
So what I am saying is that all uniform motion is in fact this trick forwards motion, that is produced when some work or energy moves forwards.
Okay. And so to recap, we have objects or waves moving forwards, which results in this time back and forth feature, that then produces this very odd sort of false motion forwards. And as a note, we humans then come along and say that they can see that waves and objects can move forwards, and that therefore there must be a time effect that also goes forwards.
Alright. And now to spell this out. There is no forwards time effect at all. But this time effect, as I have already stated, is AC, and goes backwards and forwards on the spot.
And now I don’t know if I am making this clear to you, or just confusing you. Anyway I am going to carry on with this theory now. What I want to talk about is the curious effect where the direction of time is tied into motion. So that if I accelerate say north, then time will take a step forwards. And where I accelerate south, then time will take a step backwards. And obviously where I decelerate, then these two time directions will swap places.
And now I hope what I am about to say is not too big a jump back to the torch bulb and battery. And I must warn you that this is a bit tricky to understand. Now if you remember, I said that we had a bulb which was producing time balanced, or time symmetrical light waves, where a unit of electrical energy, was lighting up a bulb. But there was also an identical unit of electrical energy, that was heading backwards towards the battery, and cancelling out the power, that just a moment ago lit up this bulb.
Okay. And now it turns out that it is impossible to make light, or any type of wave, go in just one direction. So Sir Isaac Newton’s law applies here, where he says that to every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction. And with a wave producing device, then one is effectively forced to make two opposite waves, that head in two opposite directions.
So now I need you to picture a time forwards and time backwards wave pulse, that allows a wave to move forwards. But now I hope that you will see that this north/south direction effect will result in the creation of an opposite north/south pulse, that is the other way up in time.
And so now the power supply that is receiving these cancelled pulses of electrical energy, will in fact get two sets of pulses, that will cancel out each other. So now the work cancel effect that should mean that the bulb lights up for free, is prevented from operating.
And now are you any the wiser? What this means is that although there is this work cancel effect, that should mean that a torch bulb lights up for free, this action is in fact rendered inoperative, so that now the battery is forced to provide current to power the bulb. So that it works out that for all actions that are driven by work, then energy will be conserved.
And now to return to my ultra-efficient loudspeaker design. Well it looks as though it is going to be quite impossible to make this more than 100% efficient. Although we should in theory, be able to make this energy free. However the north/south cancel effect will always spoil the action.
So what can we do? And the answer is that if we absorb the soundwaves, that leave the back of the speaker cone, then the north/south cancel action will simply not occur. And now believe it or not, it is as simple as that. I have been placing an absorbent material behind my speaker cone. (See photograph). And the effect this has on speaker efficiency is remarkable.
And now what I have done here is very tightly packed the space behind my speaker with horsehair. And then estimated the sound level, so as to approximately equal a normal speaker, being driven with five watts. And I then measured the AC voltage across my horsehair packed speaker voice coil, and to my amazement, it worked out that where the voice coil had a resistance of 8 ohms, then the incoming power that was driving the speaker and making the sound, was 0.1 watts.
Alright, so it now looked as though my sound dampened speaker could be fifty times more efficient than a normal speaker. And now I had the job of proving that this super efficiency was in fact real, and that my speaker really was almost fully loaded by 0.1 watts of power.
Sorry, and here I am going to have to be a bit technical so to prove that this speaker really was as it seemed and very efficient. I wired a small 8 ohm resistor in series with the speaker voice coil. And here I found that the voltage across this resistor, was the same as the voltage across the speaker terminals.
So now I needed to know how much heat this small series resistor produced when the speaker was in use, and so I glued the small resistor to the bulb of a thermometer. And here, with the speaker producing loud sound, the temperature rise in the resistor was so small that I could not measure it at all. So it now looked as though the power being used by the speaker, was extremely small, and was indeed 0.1 watts.
And now there was one other effect that suggested that very little power was involved here. And this was that the cone of the speaker stopped all movement, even though this same cone was producing very loud sounds.
So this is my speaker design, and I think that it proves my theory, that waves move in a work, or energy free manner. And the speaker itself, well it produces a wonderful clear sound, that I think could have many applications. I think it might possibly be employed to relax people who are clinically stressed.
And the principle of free wave power, well who knows where this could one day lead.
